Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Rosenblatt
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 14, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Helen E. Freedman, J.
The issue in this CPLR article 78 proceeding concerns the proper classification of a newly created position in the Unified Court System, entitled deputy chief clerk (arraignment parts) *451(DCCAP). The DCCAP position, devised in an effort to comply with a recent United States District Court order limiting the arrest to arraignment process in New York City Criminal Courts to a 24-hour period (Williams v Ward, 671 F Supp 225 [July 2, 1987, Motley, J.]), was created pursuant to an atypical contract between the State Unified Court System and the City of New…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grossman v. RankinNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Chittenden v. . WursterNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Burke v. AxelrodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Dillon v. Nassau County Civil Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Holcombe v. GustyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anderson v. STATE OF NY, OFFICE OF ADMIN.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Murphy v. RosenblattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- O'Neill v. PfauNew York Supreme Court · 2011
- Perfetto v. Cemetery BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1995