Wear-U-Well Shoe Co. v. Armstrong
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
STATEMENT OF FACTS.
This appeal comes from a judgment for damages assessed in a suit for malicious prosecution.
The facts are substantially that the appellant, the Wear-U-Well Shoe Company, a corporation, with its principal place of business at Kansas City, Missouri, operates chain stores in various places and parts of the country, and furnishes its shoes to different persons to sell on a commission basis, the shoes being sold by the persons to whom furnished and the proceeds remitted to the company.
On or prior to May 25, 1926, the appellee, Armstrong, was engaged in the selling of shoes for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marriott v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Spears Purifoy v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Nashville Railway & Light Co. v. TrawickTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- Smithwick v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1859
- Coleman v. Gulf Refining Co. of LouisianaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
3Cited by9 opinions
- Estate of Underwood v. National Credit Union AdministrationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Woodward v. BlytheSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Southwestern Gas & Electric Co. v. GodfreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Wheaton Van Lines, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- CITIZENS COACH COMPANY v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.