Legal Opinion
Weinmann v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 10, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOONAN, District Judge.
On March 3, 1959, at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case, I granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. The plaintiff now moves for re-argument.
The pertinent facts of this case are as follows:
In April 1937, the plaintiff’s father, Dr. Ing Edmund Weinmann, died. At his death he owned the Weinmann works which consisted of a glass factory, a zinc factory and a power plant. He also had vast stockholdings in Bruexer Bergbau, a mining corporation and in the Bohemian Union Bank.
By a decree of a Czechoslovakian court the plaintiff herein, Herbert P. Weinmann,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kenmore v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
- Kenmore v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Rogan v. FerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- French v. SmythDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
- Daley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Herbert P. Weinmann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Rodriguez-Torres v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970