Herbert P. Weinmann v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff claims a deduction for losses allegedly incurred through the nationalization of his property by the Republic of Czechoslovakia in 1945. Upon denial of this claim by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue he instituted this tax refund action. The court below dismissed the complaint on two grounds: that plaintiff is limited by his claim for refund to recovery under § 23(e) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C. § 23(e) (3), under which he cannot prevail; and that he has failed to establish a prima facie case for recovery under § 23(e) (1) and (2).…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Angelus Milling Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Real Estate - Land Title & Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Solt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
- Feinstein v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Louisa B. Gunther Farcasanu v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Powers v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
- Horst v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Hill v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
- Popa v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.