Legal Opinion
Clancy v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided September 28, 1984No. Claim No. 69288PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold E. Koreman, P. J.
Claimant, a former State employee, was injured in the course of her employment in July of 1975. At that time she filed for and received workers’ compensation benefits. Claimant subsequently returned to work but beginning in 1981 and continuing through January of 1983 she was at times absent from her employment, allegedly due to residual effects of the 1975 injury. Claimant’s employment was ultimately terminated by the State on February 10, 1983, on the ground that she has been “absent due to illness continuously for one year” (see Civil Service Law,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Austin v. Board of Higher EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- City of Schenectady v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Koerner v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Schaffer v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Finley v. GiacobbeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Finley v. GiacobbeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Taylor v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1994
- Adebambo v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1999
- Figueroa v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.