Schaffer v. Evans
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
*994We agree with the Appellate Division that plaintiff’s causes of action against the State officials are primarily claims against the State for money damages and as such could only be entertained in the Court of Claims (Court of Claims Act, § 9, subd 4). Nor can it be said that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in not converting this complaint requesting monetary compensation for past services into an article 78 proceeding.
Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer…
2Cited by34 opinions
- Gross v. PeralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Morell v. BalasubramanianNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Cass v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Ott v. BarashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Montalvo v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.