Legal Opinion

Cadle Co. v. Harvey

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 18, 2001No. 2-99-337-CVPublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAUPHINOT, Justice.

INTRODUCTION

In this case, we are asked to determine whether the trial court properly applied Texas homestead exemption laws. The Cadle Company filed suit in 1997 against Peter Marshall Harvey seeking a declaration that its judgment hen is valid against the title of property owned by Harvey and for foreclosure of the hen and attorney’s fees. Harvey counterclaimed for declaratory relief seeking cancellation of Cadle’s judgment hen on his property on the basis of homestead exemption or, alternatively, equitable subrogation. Harvey also sought recovery of attorney’s…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Ryland Group, Inc. v. HoodTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Jones v. KelleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Englander Co. v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Hirschfeld Steel Co. v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  2. Karen Corp. v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. Grider v. Mike O'Brien, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  4. City of Carrollton v. RIHR INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  5. Wilcox v. Marriott, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API