Legal Opinion

United States v. Stanley McCall

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 28, 1990No. 1511, Docket 90-1074PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINTER, Circuit Judge:

■ Stanley McCall appeals from a sentence imposed after a guilty plea. He argues that the district court applied a Sentencing Guidelines section based on his “real conduct” rather than on the offense for which he was convicted. This objection was never presented to the district court. He also argues, again for the first time, that his sentencing under the Guidelines violates the ex post facto clause of the Constitution. We reach the first issue and agree that the district court should have determined the relevant Guidelines section on the basis of McCall’s offense of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Gerald John BerminghamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Nelson Guerrero, Cesar Rivera and Anthony MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. George Story and Curtis JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Thomas BraxtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Braxton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. Joe Luis SaucedoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Robert F. Carrozza, United States of America v. Raymond J. Patriarca, United States of America v. Raymond J. PatriarcaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. James CaputoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. PaccioneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API