Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Pitic
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 9, 1998No. Claim No. 1; Claim No. 2PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 17, 1996 and January 27, 1997, which, inter alia, ruled that claimants were disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because they voluntarily left their employment without good cause.
Claimants, John Pitic and Jane L. Kerman, husband and wife, were officers and sole shareholders of a corporation that operated a junkyard. The corporation’s primary business was the dismantling of automobiles, bought at auction, and the resale of their used parts. The corporation also sold used cars and did…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of CrawfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re the Claim of SoninAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re the Claim of TepperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Claim of HoosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re RosenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of MerleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re lowmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re lowmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.