Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Hoos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 29, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 30, 1998, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the finding of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant failed to demonstrate a compelling reason for selling his sign-making business. Claimant sold his business contending that he was unable *678to pay overdue franchise royalties. It is significant that claimant continued to draw an income plus benefits despite…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of PiticAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MerleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re lowmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. In re lowmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. In re the Claim of DeneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API