State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Westlake
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.
In this action for a declaratory judgment, upon an agreed statement of facts, defendant James Westlake appeals from a judgment of the Special Term in Nassau County which declared that the plaintiff insurer is not obligated to defend or indemnify him. under the automobile policy which it issued to him (State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Westlake, 74 Misc 2d 604).
THE PACTS.
The appellant was insured by the plaintiff under a policy of automobile liability insurance. On February 1, 1971, the appellant’s wife, Wanda Westlake, was injured while a passenger in a car owned and operated by him. Mr. and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fuchs v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Feinman v. Bernard Rice Sons, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
- Peka, Inc. v. KayeNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WestlakeNew York Supreme Court · 1973