State ex rel. Agosto v. Gallagher
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{If 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the claims of appellant, Jose Agosto Jr., for writs of mandamus and procedendo to compel appellees, Judge Hollie L. Gallagher and the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, to resentence him to a lawful sentence that constitutes a valid final judgment.
{¶ 2} Agosto has already unsuccessfully sought resentencing by raising a similar claim for writs of mandamus and procedendo. State ex rel. Agosto v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 119 Ohio St.3d 366, 2008-Ohio-4607, 894 N.E.2d 314. The court of appeals correctly concluded that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. VoorhiesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Pruitt v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Castro v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State ex rel. Castro v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State ex rel. Agosto v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GrantOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State ex rel. Reese v. LoganOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. CurrieOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State ex rel. Gonzalez v. AstrabOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State ex rel. Koller v. SutulaOhio Supreme Court · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.