Legal Opinion

Gundry v. Gundry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 18, 1902PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the District Court of Canadian County; before C. F. Irwin, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by'

Hainer, J.:

This is an appeal from the district court of Canadian county from an order allowing the defendant in error temporary alimony for her support and maintenance, attorney’s fee for the preparation of trial, and for court costs. The material averments in plaintiff’s petition are: That she was married to the defendant in Cleveland, Ohio, on the-day of June, 1898, and that they lived together as husband and wife until about five weeks prior to the bringing of this action; that the plaintiff and defendant are residents of Canadian county, Oklahoma; that plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McKennon v. McKennonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Matthews v. MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Wick v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946
  3. Fowler v. FowlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Matthews v. MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  5. Redcorn v. District CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API