Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Peggy Z. Coyne v. Scott Walker

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2016No. 2013AP000416Published

1ConcurrenceShirley S. Abrahamson, J.

f 80. (concurring). I conclude, as do the lead opinion (which represents the views of only Justice Gableman) and Justice Prosser's concurrence, that 2011 Wis. Act 21, which *498altered the process of administrative rulemaking,1 is unconstitutional as applied to the Superintendent of Public Instruction and the Department of Public Instruction. As a result, I concur in the mandate affirming the court of appeals.

¶ 81. Two reasons prevent me from joining both the lead opinion and Justice Prosser's concurrence.

¶ 82. First, both Justice Gableman's lead opinion and Justice Prosser's concurrence give…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  2. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Buse v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. DoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API