Peggy Z. Coyne v. Scott Walker
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceShirley S. Abrahamson, J.
f 80. (concurring). I conclude, as do the lead opinion (which represents the views of only Justice Gableman) and Justice Prosser's concurrence, that 2011 Wis. Act 21, which *498altered the process of administrative rulemaking,1 is unconstitutional as applied to the Superintendent of Public Instruction and the Department of Public Instruction. As a result, I concur in the mandate affirming the court of appeals.
¶ 81. Two reasons prevent me from joining both the lead opinion and Justice Prosser's concurrence.
¶ 82. First, both Justice Gableman's lead opinion and Justice Prosser's concurrence give…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Buse v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. DoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.