Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
District Court, S.D. Illinois
1DissentMercer, Chief Judge
I cannot agree with the decision of the majority of the court and I therefore dissent. I would hold that the order of the Commission granting the certificate of public convenience and necessity to Short Line1 was entered in violation of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., and that the order is therefore null and void.
Contrary to the suggestion of the majority opinion, we are not concerned with the validity of the basic, or evidentiary, findings of fact of the Commission. Plaintiff does not challenge the evidentiary findings and the Commission and the United States are…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- ICC v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Schaffer Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Detroit & Cleveland Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.