Attorney General v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

The.information in this case proceeds upon ch. 273 of 1874 ; avers the defendant’s disregard of the maximum rates of fare and freight fixed by that statute; and prays a temporary injunction pendente lite, and judgment of perpetual injunction restraining tbe defendant from taking higher rates than those of that statute. And when the case came be-, fore us on motion for interlocutory injunction, we ordered a *70writ according to that prayer (35 Wis., 425), which has not since been brought before us for consideration.

Since then, eh. 278 of 1874 has been amended by chaps. 89, 118 and 834 of 1875. We…