Legal Opinion

Hebbard v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 12, 1924No. 15770PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) “The decision of every issue of fact is exclusively for the jury.” Davis v. Kirkland, 1 Ga. App. 5 (1) (58 S. E. 209). “No principle of law is founded upon better reason or has been more strictly adhered to by this court than that the jury are the proper judges of the weight and sufficiency of testimony and of the credibility of witnesses, and this court will not disturb the verdict of a jury where *47there is evidence to support its findings. Strickland v. Crawley, 1 Ga. App. 139 (58 S. E. 215); Charles v. Brooker, 1 Ga. App. 219 (58 S. E. 218); Daughtry v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. KirklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Loeb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Daughtry v. Savannah & Statesboro Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Charles v. BrookerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Stricklin & Co. v. CrawleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Carroll v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Popham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API