Hunt v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
The motion for a new trial alleges that the solicitor-general asked a witness a question, and that counsel for the defendant objected to the question. The record does not *352show that this question was ever answered or that the judge was apprised of what the answer would be if the witness should answer. This ground is, therefore, incomplete. This court will not refer to the brief of evidence for the purpose of completing an incomplete assignment of error.
The second ground of the amendment to the motion alleges that the court erred in a certain portion of the charge. The instructions given were…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Loeb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Hebbard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Clowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931