Legal Opinion

Hunt v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 10, 1928No. 18979PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial alleges that the solicitor-general asked a witness a question, and that counsel for the defendant objected to the question. The record does not *352show that this question was ever answered or that the judge was apprised of what the answer would be if the witness should answer. This ground is, therefore, incomplete. This court will not refer to the brief of evidence for the purpose of completing an incomplete assignment of error.

The second ground of the amendment to the motion alleges that the court erred in a certain portion of the charge. The instructions given were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Loeb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Hebbard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  2. Clowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  3. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API