Edison v. Department of Revenue
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The question here presented is whether or not a firm of road contractors is engaged 1 in industrial processing within the meaning of section 4(g) of the use tax act. 2
There is no dispute about the facts. The appellants build concrete highways under contract with the Michigan State highway department. They prepare the rough grades and the roadbed, they pave, and they finish. In so doing they use, and eventually consume, major equipment, such as bulldozers, repair parts, and necessary appurtenances, such as tires, tubes, and batteries. This is an action for declaratory judgment, its purnose…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Michigan Allied Dairy Ass'n v. State Board of Tax AdministrationMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Moore v. Farmers Mutual Manufacturing & Ginning Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Kress v. Department of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Romeo Homes, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Bay Bottled Gas Co. v. Department of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by15 opinions
- Town & Country Dodge, Inc. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Elias Bros. Restaurants, Inc. v. Treasury DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re D'Amico EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- Beckman Production Services, Inc. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Tercheck v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.