Legal Opinion

Romeo Homes, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1960No. Docket 44, Calendar 48,296PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

The facts in. this case are not materially in dispute. Plaintiff Romeo Homes was engaged, during the period here involved, in the erection of buildings for its customers, principally, or perhaps entirely, prefabricated houses. The prepared parts for such houses were manufactured by Seholz Homes, Inc., which was located at Toledo, Ohio, and which customarily from time to time prepared basic plans for submission to prospective customers of contractors. Alterations in said plans were permitted and written contracts for the construction work in accordance with specifications therein set forth…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. MacQueen v. City CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Heckathorn v. HeckathornMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Custom Built Homes Co. v. Kansas State Commission of Revenue & TaxationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. L. A. Darling Co. v. Water Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Acorn Iron Works, Inc. v. State Board of Tax AdministrationMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Town & Country Dodge, Inc. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Metropolitan Council No 23 v. Oakland County ProsecutorMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Pinellas County v. WoolleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Nuckols v. Andrews Investment CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Nolan v. Department of Licensing & RegulationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API