Legal Opinion

Smithgall v. Campbell

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

President Judge COLINS.

This case involves an appeal by Robert B. Campbell Jr. (Controller) from a mandamus order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County requiring the Controller to sign certain documents related to a redevelopment project in the City of Lancaster (Lancaster). The mandamus order further allowed for Charles W. Smithgall (Mayor) to sign documents in the Controller’s stead as attorney-in-fact.

The facts of this case date back several years and center on a plan to revitalize the commercial center of Lancaster, Penn Square, through the construction of a convention…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Borough of Marcus Hook v. Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Randolph Vine Associates v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Duncan Meter Corp. v. GritsavageSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Marflak v. City of ClairtonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Penn Square General Corp. v. County of LancasterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. McGAFFIC v. City of New CastleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Koppenhaver v. Department of Community & Economic DevelopmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. McGAFFIC v. City of New CastleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Smithgall v. CampbellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API