Legal Opinion

Mikell v. Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1994No. 94 CA 0242PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

649 So.2d 75 (1994)

George L. MIKELL

v.

HOFFMAN-LaROCHE, INC., et al.

No. 94 CA 0242.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

December 22, 1994.

Keith D. Jones, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellant, George L. Mikell.

Brent A. Talbot, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee, Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc.

Before LOTTINGER, C.J., and SHORTESS and CARTER, JJ.

CARTER, Judge.

This is an appeal from a trial court judgment granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of a drug manufacturer in a product's liability action.

FACTS

In early March of 1984, plaintiff George L. Mikell sought treatment for acne from Dr.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. Board of Sup'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  2. Penalber v. BlountSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  3. Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  4. Thompson v. South Central Bell Tel. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  5. Sun Belt Constructors v. T & R DRAGLINE SERV., INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Stahl v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. Vitanza v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  3. Demahy v. Actavis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  4. McCarthy v. Danek Medical, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1999
  5. In Re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API