Legal Opinion

Demahy v. Actavis, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 8, 2010No. 08-31204PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

This case presents one issue on appeal: whether the federal regulatory regime governing pharmaceuticals preempts state-law failure-to-warn claims against manufacturers of generic drugs. The Supreme Court held, in Wyeth v. Levine, that such claims are not preempted against name brand drug manufacturers. 1 While not directing our result, it shadows our conclusion that the federal regulatory regime governing generics is also without preemptive effect.

I

Julie Demahy’s physician prescribed the drug Reglan to treat her gastroesophageal reflux. For the next four…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. PLIVA, Inc. v. MensingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Elam v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  3. Wimbush Ex Rel. Estate of Buchanan v. WyethCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. Robinson v. McNeil Consumer HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. In Re Bayer Corp. Combination Aspirin Products Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API