Demahy v. Actavis, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:
This case presents one issue on appeal: whether the federal regulatory regime governing pharmaceuticals preempts state-law failure-to-warn claims against manufacturers of generic drugs. The Supreme Court held, in Wyeth v. Levine, that such claims are not preempted against name brand drug manufacturers. 1 While not directing our result, it shadows our conclusion that the federal regulatory regime governing generics is also without preemptive effect.
I
Julie Demahy’s physician prescribed the drug Reglan to treat her gastroesophageal reflux. For the next four…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- PLIVA, Inc. v. MensingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Elam v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Wimbush Ex Rel. Estate of Buchanan v. WyethCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Robinson v. McNeil Consumer HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- In Re Bayer Corp. Combination Aspirin Products Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.