Legal Opinion
Roessler v. State
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 10, 1969No. 257PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
The trial court denied petitioner’s motion to vacate and set aside a judgment of conviction; he appeals. We consider: (1) whether the motion is authorized under our rules and (2) the claims made in the motion.
1. Authority for the motion.
In 1952, defendant pled guilty to contributing to the delinquency of a female minor under the age of eighteen years. Subsequently, the trial court vacated the judgment and sentence. Upon the state’s appeal, this action of the trial court was reversed; the original judgment and sentence was reinstated. State v. Roessler, 58 N.M. 102, 266 P.2d…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. SisnerosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. TiptonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. RaburnNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. FerrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. PadillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. ApodacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- Burton v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.