State v. Lucero
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Defendant’s bribery convictions were affirmed by this Court in a memorandum opinion. State v. Lucero, (Ct.App.) No. 1810, decided May 11, 1976. Subsequently, defendant moved for a new trial. The trial court denied the motion; defendant appeals. We discuss: (1) the motion, (2) denial of the motion, and (3) matters outside the record.
The Motion
Rule 60(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure abolishes the common law writ of eoram nobis but authorizes relief from a “final .judgment, order, or proceeding” on six specified grounds. Ground (2) involves newly discovered evidence;…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. RondeauNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- Chacon v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. KlasnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
- State v. SeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. FuentesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Durham v. GuestNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. WoodNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. WoodNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. EscamillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- Poorbaugh v. MullenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.