Van Patten v. Van Patten
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Concurrence
RAPER, Justice, Retired,
specially concurring.
I concur in most of the views of the majority, but believe we can and should go further and settle the case completely rather than remanding for further consideration by the trial judge. I do not agree to a remand for further hearing.
I am convinced that a person in possession at the time a mortgage is given by another has a right superior to that of the mortgagee under the circumstances of this case when no inquiry was made by the mortgagee of the interests of appellants, parents of the mortgagor, who had paid the mortgagor for the land but their…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nussbacher v. ManderfeldWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
- Rohrbaugh v. MoklerWyoming Supreme Court · 1920
- Stryker v. RaschWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. MeekerWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
- Koontz v. Town of South SuperiorWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.