Cade v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
Arnold Cade appeals from his jury trial conviction of robbery as a class C felony, for which he received a sentence of seven (7) years. The evidence reveals he took food from a customer at the drive-through window of a fast-food restaurant. On appeal, he claims the trial court should have replayed testimony to the jury as it had requested. We affirm.
After it had begun to deliberate, the jury sent the trial judge the following request:
*625Could the jury listen to the testimony of any of the witnesses for further review and consideration?
The record reveals the Defendant agreed that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ortiz v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- Survance v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Berry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Douglas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dowdy v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Foster v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Hogan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Pettrie v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Hamilton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.