Legal Opinion

William Hagerty v. L & L Marine Services, Inc., and Union Carbide Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 20, 1986No. 85-3147PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON RECONSIDERATION BY THE COURT

OPINION

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

We said in our prior writing that a plaintiff may recover damages for serious mental distress “with or without physical injury” (see 788 F.2d 315, 318). This assumed an actionable injury and we intended no opinion as to the nature of the injury required to give rise to an actionable claim. See Adams v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 783 F.2d 589, 593 (5th Cir.1986); Annot. 64 A.L.R.2d 100.

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the reconsideration of this cause en banc, and a majority of the judges in active…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. William Hagerty v. L & L Marine Services, Inc., and Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  2. Ernest E. Adams v. Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
  3. O'CONNOR v. First Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. Metro-North Commuter Railroad v. BuckleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API