Hannan v. Seidentopf
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Pottawattamie District Court. — Hon. Walter I. Smith, Judge.. These cases were tried together below, aud are submitted here ou one record. Save that different tracts of land are involved, the facts are identical in the two actions, which are brought in equity to cancel certain conveyances of real estate, and quiet title thereof in plaintiffs. There was a decree for plaintiffs, aud defendants appeal.-
1Opinion of the CourtWaterman, J.
*6601 *659There is a dispute between counsel as to whether the title to this laud — 200 acres — was originally in William Seidento.pf, or his wife, Mary. We arc not able to decide this matter from the data given in the record. However, the question is of no importance, in the view we tahe of the case. Both of those persons are now dead, and Will F. and Ellen M. Seidentopf, their sole heirs, are par*660ties defendant herein. William and Mary Seidentopf executed a mortgage on the lands in dispute to the KimballChamp Investment Company, which afterwards became insolvent, and of whose assets -Charles It.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dickey v. LyonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Steele & Son v. Sioux Valley BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Bradley v. ColeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Nolan v. GrantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- Nelson v. WadeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rippe v. BadgerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Taylor v. LindenmannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Walter v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Young v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- O'Neill v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.