Legal Opinion

West Coast Power Co. v. Buttram

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1934No. , 6084PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

Respondent brought this suit to enjoin appellants from plowing into, cutting, breaking, damaging, or in any way interfering with a wood stave pipe-line belonging to and in use by it, which crosses agricultural land belonging to and in use by them. The trial resulted in a decree “that the defendants and each of them, their agents, servants, employees, and all persons acting for them, and each of them, be, and they are hereby enjoined and restrained from in any manner plowing into, or, by plowing into, cutting breaking or damaging any part of the pipe line of the plaintiff extending through the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Bellevue v. DalyIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Morris v. BluntUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Coulsen v. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Smith v. WornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Parks v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nielson v. SandbergUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Drieth v. DormerNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Tomchak v. HarrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Cusic v. GivensIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  5. City of Payette v. JacobsenIdaho Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API