Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 23, 2011No. 08-1314PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

*80OPINION OF THE COURT

[562 U.S. 326]

2Opinion of the Court · BreyerJustice Breyer

Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 208 (1989 version) requires, among other things, that auto manufacturers install seatbelts on the rear seats of passenger vehicles. They must install lap-and-shoulder belts on seats next to a vehicle’s doors or frames. But they have a choice about what to install on rear inner seats (say, middle seats or those next to a minivan’s aisle). There they can install either (1) simple lap belts or (2) lap-and-shoulder belts. 54 Fed. Reg. 46257-46258 (1989); 49 CFR § 571.208 (1993), promulgated pursuant to the National Traffic…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by37 opinions

  1. PLIVA, Inc. v. MensingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Mut. Pharm. Co. v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  4. POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Miami County Board of Commissioners v. Kanza Rail-Trails Conservancy, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API