Legal Opinion
Cosby v. Purkett
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided January 24, 1992No. 91-1918C(5)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
782 F.Supp. 1324 (1992)
Gregory COSBY, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
James PURKETT, et al., Defendants.
No. 91-1918C(5).
United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D.
January 24, 1992.
Gregory D. Cosby, Keith Jackson, Diamond C. Slater and D.M. Perkin-Bey, pro se.
John F. Cooney, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, Mo., for Purkett and Allen.
MEMORANDUM
LIMBAUGH, District Judge.
Pro se prisoner plaintiffs have filed a § 1983 action against defendants James Purkett, Superintendent at the Farmington Correctional Center (FCC) and Tim Allen, a functional unit manager (of Housing Unit 5) at the FCC. Plaintiffs allege…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beckford v. PortuondoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2001
- Pfeil v. LampertDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2014
- Dan v. State of NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2025
- Leyva v. PortlockDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2018