Legal Opinion
MacDonald v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 29, 1928PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
The declaration in two counts alleges, in substance, that the defendant’s servants or agents so negligently operated a street car on a highway in Medford as to cause a collision between the car and a motor vehicle driven by the plaintiff, thereby damaging the motor vehicle and injuring the plaintiff’s wife, and that he was put to expense for medical attendance, medicine and the loss of her services. The defendant’s answer consisted of a general denial and an allegation of contributory negligence.
*476The plaintiff, in cross-examination, was asked several questions relating to the registration of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Newcomb v. Boston Protective DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Dudley v. Northampton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Chase v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Fairbanks v. KempMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- McDonald v. DundonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Baggs v. HirschfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Capano v. MelchionnoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Balian v. OgassinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- vanDresser v. FirlingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Burns v. WinchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.