Commonwealth v. Lynes
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant has failed to sustain his burden of demonstrating that the pretrial procedures identifying the defendant as one of the robbers were suggestive. See Commonwealth v. Schlieff, 5 Mass. App. Ct. 665, 670 (1977); Commonwealth v. Chase, 372 Mass. 736, 745 (1977). The trial judge could have found that the selection of the defendant’s photograph by one of the victims from an array of eight or ten photographs was free of suggestion on the part of the police. The fact that no more than seven or ten photographs were used did not render the procedure suggestive. See Commonwealth v. Gilday,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Commonwealth v. GildayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Commonwealth v. MobleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. WheelerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
- Commonwealth v. SchlieffMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. LynesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982