Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Crismon

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 13, 1974No. 9551PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BILLINGS, Judge.

Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation [hereinafter F.D.I.C.] instituted this replevin suit against Larry G. Crismon and W. W. Harris, seeking possession of a Caterpillar tractor and damages for its taking and detention. Intervening plaintiff Edwin M. McCabe sought possession of the tractor and damages from F.D.I.C.

W. W. Harris disclaimed any interest in the tractor and was dismissed from the suit by F.D.I.C. Answer was filed on behalf of Larry G. Crismon to F.D.I.C.’s petition but neither he nor his attorney appeared at the trial and a motion for directed verdict in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Elliott v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Starnes v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Herndon v. FordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baumstark v. JordanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Jones v. WashburnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Estate of Seiser v. MeierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Lawrence v. Steadley Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Summit Lumber Co. v. HigginbothamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API