Legal Opinion

Scholle v. State Tax Commission

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1938No. 4360PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDSPETH, Chief Justice.

Fred Scholle sued for the cancellation of assessments of improvements on his property in Belen, Valencia county, N. Mex.. and the return of taxes paid under protest.'

For the years 1931 and 1933 there was no appeal from the valuation placed upon the property by the assessor, but Scholle maintains that the assessments are illegal and invalid, and that he has a right to invoke the jurisdictional remedies against the illegal acts of the assessor. This question was determined adverse to Scholle in Re Blatt, 41 N.M. 269, 67 P.2d 293, 303, 110 A.L.R. 656, where we quoted from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stanley v. Supervisors of AlbanySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. State v. BlattNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  3. South Spring Ranch & Cattle Co. v. State Board of EqualizationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Abreu v. State Tax CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Ute Creek Ranch Co. v. McBrideNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re TriggNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Vermejo Club v. FrenchNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  3. In Re TriggNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Vermejo Club v. FrenchNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API