Cortelyou v. Charles Eneu Johnson & Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brewer
This is a suit to restrain'an alleged infringement of-a patent granted June 22, 1897, for the stencil ■ duplicating machine known as the rotary Neostyle. .The plaintiffs below, petitioners here,' represent the entire interest in the patent. There is no claim of any infringement, by using or selling the patented machines, but of-an indirect infringement in the following manner: For the last few years the rotary Neostyle has been sold subject to this license, which was plainly disclosed on the baseboard of tlie'fnachine: “License agreement. This machine is sold by the Neostyle Company with the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bement v. National Harrow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
3Cited by13 opinions
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Henry v. A. B. Dick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. StrausSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Individual Drinking Cup Co. v. ErrettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Indiana Mfg. Co. v. Nichols & Shepard Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.