Legal Opinion

Davis v. Mills

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 25, 1903No. 64PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut.

1Per curiam

The plaintiff is a citizen of Montana, and the owner, by assignment, of three causes of action (for goods sold and on promissory note) against the Obelisk Mining & Concentrating Company, a Montana corporation. The indebtedness of the company upon these causes of action accrued July 31, 1892, July 1, 1892, and December 12, 1892, respectively.

The defendants are citizens of Connecticut, resident continuously therein for more than 12 years last past, and at all the times mentioned *704in the complaint were trustees of the said company. The statutes of Montana provide that within 20 days from the 1st…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Plumb v. GriffinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
  2. Brunswick Terminal Co. v. National Bank of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1900
  3. O'Connor v. Town of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  4. Wells v. CooperSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
  5. Hobbs v. National Bank of Commerce of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Standard Salt & Cement Co. v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. United States v. JacobsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
  3. Eclipse Lumber Co. v. Iowa Loan & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  4. Harrop v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API