Legal Opinion

In Re Miller, Unpublished Decision (3-26-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 2007No. 2006-CA-0059UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION {¶ 1} William Shade Miller, a minor child, appeals a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, Licking County, Ohio, which found him to be a delinquent by reason of committing a theft which would be a misdemeanor if committed by an adult. Appellant assigns a single error to the trial court:

{¶ 2} "I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FAILING TO ALLOW THE MINOR CHILD, WILLIAM SHADE MILLER, TO SUPPLEMENT HIS OBJECTIONS BY FILING A TRANSCRIPT OF THE PROCEEDINGS."

{¶ 3} The record indicates appellant had been charged with theft of goods in excess of $500.00, which would be a felony of the fifth degree…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pitts v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. City of Cleveland Heights v. RichardsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Wingard v. Wingard, Unpublished Decision (12-30-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Black v. BrewerOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Aban v. SchaefferOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. TRE Properties v. MeansOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API