In Re Miller, Unpublished Decision (3-26-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION {¶ 1} William Shade Miller, a minor child, appeals a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, Licking County, Ohio, which found him to be a delinquent by reason of committing a theft which would be a misdemeanor if committed by an adult. Appellant assigns a single error to the trial court:
{¶ 2} "I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FAILING TO ALLOW THE MINOR CHILD, WILLIAM SHADE MILLER, TO SUPPLEMENT HIS OBJECTIONS BY FILING A TRANSCRIPT OF THE PROCEEDINGS."
{¶ 3} The record indicates appellant had been charged with theft of goods in excess of $500.00, which would be a felony of the fifth degree…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pitts v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Cleveland Heights v. RichardsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Wingard v. Wingard, Unpublished Decision (12-30-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
3Cited by3 opinions
- Black v. BrewerOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Aban v. SchaefferOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- TRE Properties v. MeansOhio Court of Appeals · 2013