Legal Opinion
Finnegan v. Hillsboro Ford-Mercury Sales
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 30, 2011No. 10CA16PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Finnegan v. Hillsboro Ford-Mercury Sales,
2011-Ohio-5359.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HIGHLAND COUNTY LINDSAY FINNEGAN, : : Plaintiff-Appellant, : Case No. 10CA16 : vs. : : Released: September 30, 2011 HILLSBORO FORD-MERCURY : SALES, et al., : DECISION AND JUDGMENT : ENTRY Defendants-Appellees. : APPEARANCES: Lindsay Finnegan, Hillsboro, Ohio, pro se Appellant. Michael D. Stultz, Karl C. Kerschner, and Lincoln E. Fielding, Meyer & Kerschner, LTD., Tiffin, Ohio, for Appellees. McFarland, J.: {¶1} Appellant Lindsay Finnegan appeals the judgment of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Production Credit Association v. HedgesOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems v. MullinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Keeton v. Telemedia Co. of Southern OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Portco, Inc. v. Eye Specialists, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Young v. HobbsOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brown v. PotterOhio Court of Appeals · 2015