Legal Opinion

Thornley & Pitt v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 5, 1945No. C. D. 938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

This is a protest against the assessment of duty by the collector on 744.45 proof gallons of straight bourbon whisky contained in 15 barrels entered at San Francisco on March 11, 1935, in customs bonded warehouse. Prior to January 1, 1936, five barrels were withdrawn and duty paid at the rate of $5 per proof gallon under paragraph 802 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The remaining 10 barrels were withdrawn subsequent to the trade agreement with Canada, T. D. 48033, which amended paragraph 802 by reducing the rate of duty to $2.50 per proof gallon, and duty was paid at that rate. An…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Borgfeldt & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  2. United States v. National Aniline & Chemical Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. Park & Tilford v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  4. Kolmar, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  5. Oldetyme Distillers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Washington State Liquor Control Board v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API