Legal Opinion

In re S.L.M.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1997No. Nos. 96-576, 96-337, 96-220, 96-546 and 96-547PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

The appellants in these five appeals challenge the Extended Jurisdiction Prosecution Act, §§ 41-5-1601 through -1607, MCA, (EJPA) as being unconstitutional under the equal protection, due process and double jeopardy clauses of the United States and Montana constitutions, as well as under Article II, Section 15 of the Montana Constitution. Although there are some factual differences in how each prosecution evolved as well as differences in the conclusions reached by the various District Courts, the constitutional issues presented encompass each of the appeals. Accordingly, we consolidate these…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Gryczan v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Butte Community Union v. LewisMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Clark v. Eagle Systems, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Montana Automobile Ass'n v. GreelyMontana Supreme Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Powell v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. DuffyMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Henry v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. AdgersonMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. PriceMontana Supreme Court · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API