Legal Opinion

Henry v. State Compensation Insurance Fund

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1999No. 98-351PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

¶ 1 The Workers’ Compensation Court held that the Montana Legislature’s failure to provide vocational rehabilitation benefits to diseased workers under the Occupational Disease Act (ODA), like it provided to injured workers under the Workers’ Compensation Act (WCA), does not violate the equal protection clause of the Montana Constitution. Jerry Henry appeals. We reverse and remand.

¶2 The dispositive issue presented on appeal is whether the Occupational Disease Act violates the equal protection clause of the Montana Constitution because it fails to provide vocational rehabilitation benefits to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Butte Community Union v. LewisMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Johansen v. State, Dept. of Natural ResourcesMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Stratemeyer v. Lincoln CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Cottrill v. Cottrill Sodding ServiceMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Davis v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Powell v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Snetsinger v. Montana University SystemMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. PriceMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Walters v. FLATHEAD CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC.Montana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Reesor v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API