Meek v. Bishop Peterson & Sharp, P.C.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDELMAN, Justice.
In this suit for collection of attorneys fees, Susan B. Meek appeals from a judgment entered in favor of Bishop Peterson & Sharp, P.C. (“Bishop”) on the grounds that (1) the trial court entered a judgment for negligence when the correct cause of action was breach of contract, (2) exemplary damages were awarded for fraud when no actual damages for fraud were found, and (3) post-judgment sanctions were not warranted. We affirm in part and reverse and render in part.
Bishop is a law firm which represented Meek in a lawsuit. 1 When Meek failed to pay its fees and costs,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- GTE Communications Systems Corp. v. TannerTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Federal Express Corp. v. DutschmannTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Bellefonte Underwriters Insurance Co. v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Sullivan v. BarnettTexas Supreme Court · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Webb v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Indian Beach Property Owners' Ass'n v. Linden, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Stewart, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
- XCO Production Co. v. Jamison, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- Willis v. Donnelly, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.