Legal Opinion

Cokinis v. Maywood-Proviso State Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 11, 1980No. 78-1555PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Peter Cokinis and Isabelle Cokinis, his wife, plaintiffs, brought this action against Maywood-Proviso State Bank (the bank) and Peter D. Giachini, John Murphy and Michael Cooper, doing business as Giachini & Murphy, defendants, for alleged fraudulent and willful and wanton conduct with respect to a sheriff’s sale of plaintiffs’ property. The court directed a verdict for defendants on the allegations of fraud and willful and wanton conduct, but submitted plaintiffs’ claim to the jury as a claim against Cooper and the bank for negligence. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs against…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Churchill v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Exline v. WeldonIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. De Koven Drug Co. v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. Martin v. McIntoshAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Szajna v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Williams v. Chicago Osteopathic Health SystemsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. Pennsylvania Truck Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellant v. Solar Equity Corporation, Defendant-Counterplaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Anderson v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Rittenhouse v. Tabor Grain Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API