Legal Opinion
Arrington v. Cleveland
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 20, 1951No. 15260PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CULVER, Justice.
Suit by Courts Cleveland and wife and other property owners in" the Hillcrest Addition sought to enjoin the appellants Dera Arrington and Ethel Cloer from violating a covenant restricting their property to residential use. The land involved is triangular in shape with its hypotenuse lying along Camp Bowie Boulevard, ad mittedly one of the most heavily traveled highways in the city, and being Lot 34, Block 13, Hillcrest Addition to the city, less the south fifty feet which is owned and occupied as a residence by appellees Cleveland and wife.
The Court directed a verdict in favor…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hooper v. LottmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Stewart v. WelshTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Bethea v. LockhartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Shaffer v. Rector Well Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- Holstein v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1889
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- City of Fort Worth v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Farmer v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- City of Houston v. Muse, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
- Davis v. HintonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Sharpstown Civic Ass'n, Inc. v. PickettTexas Supreme Court · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.