Legal Opinion

City of Houston v. Muse

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided April 5, 1990No. 01-89-00487-CVPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHEN, Justice.

The City of Houston sued the Muses to enjoin them from operating a business in violation of a covenant restricting property use to residential purposes only. The trial judge found that the Muses breached the covenant by using the premises as a business. He also found against them on their affirmative defenses of waiver and limitations, but found for them on the defense of laches. For its remedy, the court neither entirely prohibited the operation of the business nor allowed it to operate unrestricted. Instead, the trial court allowed it to continue, but enjoined the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ZappTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Brazos River Authority v. City of GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. City of Fort Worth v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Culver v. PickensTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  5. INWOOD NORTH HOMEOWNERS'ASS'N, INC. v. MeierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Jim Rutherford Investment Inc. v. Terramar Beach Community Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  2. Exxon Corporation v. Oxxford Clothes, Inc. And Oxxford Clothes Xx, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  3. Stephens v. Dolcefino, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  4. Parker v. Dodge, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  5. Hawkins v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API