Walash v. Walash
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
While it is true that the hearing court’s determination in a custody dispute, based as it is upon a first-hand assessment of the parties, their credibility, and their character and temperaments, will often be accorded great deference on appeal (see, Matter of Louise E. S. v W. Stephen S., 64 NY2d 946; Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167; Skolnick v Skolnick, 142 AD2d 570), the authority of this Court is as broad as that of the hearing court (see, Matter of Louise E. S. v W. Stephen S., supra; Leistner v Leistner, 137 AD2d 499), and we would be seriously remiss if, simply in…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Friederwitzer v. FriederwitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Louise E. S. v. W. Stephen S.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Skolnick v. SkolnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Leistner v. LeistnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- George W. S. v. Donna S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Hanway v. HanwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Matter of Newton v. McFarlaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Wiener v. WienerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Dacey v. DaceyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995