Legal Opinion

Schmidt, Admx. v. Prudential Ins. Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1928No. 1395PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP COURT.

The following is taken, verbatim, from the opinion.

PUNK, J.

Counsel for plaintiff contend that the rights of the parties should be determined according to the laws of West Virginia, and that, under the law of that state, a contract of insurance obtained by a person of his own life, for the benefit of another having no interest in his life, is void as against public policy — in other words, that said Anna did not have an in-sux*able interest in decedent.

Counsel further contend that the legal effect of having named a beneficiary without an insurable interest in decedent, is the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burdette v. Columbus Mutual Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Strachan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. Rakestraw v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API