Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Schultz
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Woods County; L. T. Wilson, Judge. Action by Clell Schultz against the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Ee Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff,’ and defendant brings error. citing: Marshall v. Marshall, 7 Okla. 240; Winn v. Frost, 6 Okla. 89; Schuler v. Fowler (Kan.) 64 Pac. 1035; Hardware Co. v. Bank, 54 Kan. 273; Steele v. Duncan, 47 Kan. 511.
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
On February 2, 1906, Clell Schultz, defendant in error, plaintiff below, sued .the Atchison,. Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, plaintiff in error, defendant below, in the probate court of Woods county for an alleged breach of contract for a shipment of live stock,; and prayed damages therefor in the sum of $642, with interest thjereon from September 21, 1905, the date of said contract. On February 23, 1906, defendant moved the court to require plaintiff to make his petition more definite and certain, and that he state whether the contract was in writing, and, if/, so, to attach a copy to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Poff v. LockridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
3Cited by13 opinions
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Oklahoma Railway Co. v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Hollister v. KorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- In Re Estate of BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Harn v. Amazon Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.